EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRITY ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE THROUGH MOTIVATION AS A MEDIATION VARIABLES IN PT KATELOC INDONESIA

Aga Yudho Prasetyo; Abdul Rivai; Suharto

doi:10.47742/ijbssr.v1n1p1

Authors

Aga Yudho Prasetyo Universitas KrisnadwipayanaCampus Unkris Jatiwaringin
Abdul Rivai Universitas KrisnadwipayanaCampus Unkris Jatiwaringin
Suharto Universitas KrisnadwipayanaCampus Unkris Jatiwaringin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v1n1p1

Keywords:

knowledge management, integrity, motivation and company performance

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of knowledge management and integrity on company performance through motivation as a mediating variable at PT. Kateloc Indonesia. The research sample was 283 employees. The data collection technique used questionnaires and data analysis used path analysis. The results showed that the knowledge management variable partially affected company performance. The integrity variable partially affects company performance. The motivation variable partially affects company performance. Knowledge management variables partially influence motivation. The integrity variable partially affects motivation.

The influence of knowledge management on company performance is 0.548. The effect of knowledge management on performance through motivation is 0.676 X 0.868 = 0.587. In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the motivation variable is intervening. The direct effect of integrity on company performance is 0.659. Meanwhile, the influence of integrity on company performance through motivation is 0.782 X 0.868 = 0.679. In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the work motivation variable is intervening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brahmasari, Ida Ayu dan Agus Suprayetno, (2008). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan serta Dampaknya pada Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi kasus pada PT. Pei Hai International Wiratama Indonesia). Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. Vol 10 No. 2, September : 124-135. http://jurnalmanajemen.petra.ac.id/index.php/man/article/view/17039.

Daft, Richard L. (2010). Manajemen. Edisi Kelima Jilid Satu. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Elliot, et.al, (2000). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning, The Mc. Graw Hill Companies, America.

Howard, D.L and Pritchard, M. P.; Havitz, M. C. (1999), “Analyzing The Commitment Loyalty Link in Service Context,” Journal the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 333-348

Makmun, Abin Syamsuddin. (2003). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda Karya Remaja.

Mangkuprawira, S.Tb., (2011), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.

Miner, John. B. (2005). Organizational Behavior: Performance and Productivity, First Edition, random House, Inc. New York.

Moeheriono. (2010). Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Surabaya: Ghalia Indonesia.

Murti dan Hudiwinarsih. (2012). Pengaruh Kompensasi, Motivasi Dan Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Akuntansi (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Surabaya). The Indonesian Accounting Review Volume 2, No. 2, July 2012, pages 215 – 228. https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/tiar/article/view/97

Noe, Raymond A, et al., (2003), Human Resources Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, 4 edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.

Rivai, Veithzal dan Sagala, Ella Jauvani. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Siagian, Sondang P. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

T. Hani Handoko. 2004. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumberdaya Manusia, Penerbit BPFE, Yogyakarta

Uno, Hamzah B. 2009. Teori Motivasi Dan Pengukurannya (Analisis Di Bidang Pendidikan). Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Wibowo. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

International Journal of Business and Social Science Research