Nigeria's Perpetual Underdevelopment and Theory of Development Policy

Mashhud Fashola

doi:10.47742/ijbssr.v3n2p1

Authors

Mashhud Fashola Lagos State University, Dept. of Economics, Ojo, Lagos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v3n2p1

Keywords:

underdevelopment, sustainable development, development policy

Abstract

The paper revealed how Nigeria has remained perpetually underdeveloped by various development indicators. To explain Nigeria’s perpetual underdevelopment, the paper presented a Structural Theory of Development Policy. The theory postulates an interrelationship among four components of any economic system, comprising policy instruments (vector x), external exogenous variables (vector u), target and non-target
endogenous variables (vectors y and z), impacting welfare function w(y), as illustrated below:
The theory elucidates perpetual underdevelopment by the following obstacles:
(i) Perverted articulation of development objectives
(ii) Deficient knowledge of the economic system
(iii) Excessive vulnerability to external factors
(iv) Limited capacity for policy implementation
The resolution of these obstacles was discussed. However, the deficient knowledge of the economic system was considered the critical factor for extensive empirical analysis. A classical illustration is the foreign-exchange excess-demand theory, empirically proven to be a false paradigm, inapplicable to the Nigerian economy characterized by overwhelming dependence on primary commodity exports, price and income inelastic demand for goods and services, double-digit inflation rate, severe political instability, and unbridled corruption fuelling capital flight. Comprehensive econometric analysis for Nigeria negated the foreign exchange excess demand theory in all its ramifications, justifying the need for foreign exchange market regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baran, Paul (1975). The Political Economy of Neo-Colonialism. London, Heinemann.

Barbier, E. (1987) The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development, Environmental Conservation 14(2), 101-110

Bauer, Peter T. (1984). Reality and Rhetoric: Studies in the Economics of Development, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Buchanan, M. (1954). Social choice, democracy, and free markets. Journal of Political Economy 62: 114-123.

Chang, Ha-Joon, (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, London, Anthem Press.

Dasgupta, P. (2007) “The Idea of Sustainable Development” Sustainability Science 2(1), 5-11.

Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, N.J. National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press.

Galtung, J. (1972). A Structural Theory of Imperialism (PRIO Publication 27-1), JPR VIII (2), 81-117; Journal of Peace Research 2(1) 64-90.

Goulet, D. (1971). The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development; New York, Athenaeum.

Griffin, K. & Gurley, J. (1985). Radical analysis of imperialism, the Third World and the transition to socialism: A survey article, Journal of Economic Literature 23, 1089-1143.

Grindle M. S., Thomas, J, W. (1991). Public Choices and Public Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins U.P.

Koyck, L. M. (1954). Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis. Amsterdam. North-Holland Publishing Company.

Kuznets, S. (1971). Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure; Cambridge MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections, American Economic Review 63 (Sept. 1973), 247-258.

Lal, D. (1985). The Poverty of Development Economics, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard U.P.

Lewellen T. C. (1998). Dependency and Development: An Introduction to the Third World, Westport, Conn., Bergin & Garvey.

Leys, C. (1975). Under development in Kenya: The Political Economy of Neo-colonialism, London, Heinemann.

Little, I., (1982). Economic Development: Theories, Policies and International Relations.New York, Basic Books.

Nerlove, Marc (1958). Distributed Lags and Demand Analysis for Agricultural and other Commodities, Agricultural Handbook No. 141. US Department of Agriculture.

Olagunju, T. E. (2015). Drought, Desertification and the Nigerian Environment: A review. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment, vol. 7(7), 196-209.

Olutayo, A. O., Omobowale, A. O. (2007). Capitalism, Globalisation, and Underdevelopment Process in Africa: History in perpetuity. Africa Development 32(2).

Pearce, D., Markandya, A., and Barbier, E. (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy, London, Earthscan.

Seers, D. (1969). The Meaning of Development. Eleventh World Conference of the Society for International Development, New Delhi.

Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities; Amsterdam, North Holland.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom; New York, Alfred Knopf.

Singer, H. W. (1970). Dualism revisited: A new approach to the problem of dual societies in developing countries” Journal of Development Studies 7 (1970), 60-61.

Syrquin, M., Taylor, L., Westphal, L. E. (eds.) (1984). Economic Structure and Performance: Essays in Honor of Hollis B. Chenery; Orlando, Academy Press.

Tinbergen, J. (1960). Development Planning; Amsterdam; World University Library.

Tinbergen, J. (1978). Economic Policy: Principles and Design, Amsterdam, North Holland.

Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic Development (12th edn). Addison-Wesley.

United Nations (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; General Assembly Resolution 42/187; December 11, 1987.

UNDP (2011). The Human Development Report; New York.

UNDP (2019). The Human Development Report; New York.

Weisskopf, T. E. (1972). Capitalism, Underdevelopment, and the Future of the Poor Countries, Journal of Radical Political Economics 4(1), 1-35.

World Bank (1991). World Development Report. Washington D.C. The World Bank.

hptts://www.data.worldbank.org 2019

hptts://www.fao.org/Oct. 10, 2020

International Journal of Business and Social Science Research