Analysis Of Local Government Financial Performance Based On The Method Value For Money
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v4n10p1Keywords:
values, Professionalism and institutional performance as well as strengthening institutional performanceAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the financial performance of the Makassar City Government based on the Value For Money (VFM) method, namely to analyze the measurement of economic ratios, efficiency and effectiveness (3E). The type of research used is quantitative with a quantitative descriptive approach, namely collecting data, compiling, interpreting, and analyzing it so as to provide conclusions about local government financial performance using Value For Money. The data used is secondary data, namely data on the financial reports of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) of the Makassar City Government. The results of the indicate that the economic and efficiency ratios have met the Value For Money standard so that the budget can be more targeted and enjoyed by the community, while the effectiveness ratio has not met the Value For Money standard but there is still a need for continuous improvement in public services so that the effectiveness of government performance is achieved even better in the coming year. But the performance of Makassar City Government as a whole is good.
Downloads
References
Adam Oliver. (2013), “From Nudging to Budging: Using Behavioral Economics to Inform Public Sector Policy”, Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial, Volume 42, Edisi 4, Oktober 2013, hlm.685-700. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000299
Balaboniene, Ingrida; Vecerskiene, Giedre. (2014), “The Peculiarities of Performance Measurement in Universities, Journal Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences : 19th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management 2014, ICEM-2014, 23-25 April 2014, Riga, Latvia. Amsterdam : Elsevier. ISSN 1877-0428. 2014, 156, 605-611. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.249
Bajarek, Z.M. and Bevan, S.M. (2015), “Payment-Related-Performance in the UK Public Sector: A Review of the Recent Evidence of Effectiveness and Value for Money”, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, Vol.2 No.2, pp.94-109.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2015-0011
Barret P (2004). Financial Management in the Public Sector - How Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Improves Governance and Accountability, Auditor-General for Australia
Evelyn Nsiah Asare, The Best From Evelyn Nsiah Asare. (2016).Measures of Ensuring Value for Money in Public Procurement: The Case of Selected Polytechnics in Ghana. Journal of Logistics Management 2016, 5(1):22-31. DOI: 10.5923/j.logistics.20160501.04
Ewama JL (2003). The Impact of the Auditor General's Control on Public Financial Management MUBS research bulletin July-Dec. 2003, p. 17
Halim, A., & Iqbal, M.. (2019).Regional Financial Management.Regional Financial Management Anthology Series. Publisher UPPS STIM YKPN. Yogyakarta.
Harry Saputra, L., Liando., David Paul, E, L., English, E. (2014). Analysis of the Financial Performance of the Sangihe Islands District Government Using the Value For Money Method. EMBA Journal, Vol.2 No.3 September 2014,Page 1686-1694.
Ingrida Balaboniene and Giedre Vecerskiene. ((2015), "Performance Measurement Aspects of Public Sector Organizations", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 213, 1 December 2015, Pages 314-320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.544
Isna Tupai., Fire,P. (2015).Analysis of Financial Performance with a Value For Money Approach at the Tebing Tinggi District Court. Journal of Accounting and Business Research, Volume 15 No.1/March, Pages 78-85.
Mahmudi (2011). Public sector accounting. UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Mahmudi (2020).Regional Financial Management. Erlangga Publisher; Jakarta.
Mardiasmo. (2009). Public sector accounting. ANDI Publisher. Yogyakarta.
Matti Siemiatycki and Naem Farooqi (2012), “Value for Money and Risk in Public-Private Partnerships”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Volume 78,2012-Issue 3, Pages 286-299.https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.715525
Mohammad Shakil Malek dan Pradip Gundaliya (2021), “Value for Money Factors in Indian Public-Private Partnership Road Projects: An Exploratory Approach”, Journal of Project Management 6 (2021) 23-32, doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2020.10 .002
Musa Bukenya (2014). “Quality of Accounting Information and Financial Performance of Uganda”, American Journal of Research Communication”, Volume 2 (5): 183-203, ISSN: 2325-4076,www.usa-journals.com
Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2019 concerning Regional Financial Management.
Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc. (2020), “The Impact of Adoption of Public Sector Scorecards on the Effectiveness of Accounting Information Systems on Sustainable Performance of the Public Sector”, Journal of Cogent Business & Management, 7:1, 1717718, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1717718
SAC 3, (1990). The Public Sector Accounting Standards Board of the Australian Accounting Research Foundation and the Accounting Standards Review Board. Australia
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License