Modeling and Optimization of Service Investigation Services: Empirical Study Using Pop-Hrm Approach at Head of Private Smk School in Bogor District, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47742/ijbssr.v4n9p2Keywords:
Serving Leadership, Adversity Intelligence, Proactive Personality, Teamwork, Organizational Commitment, Work Motivation, SITOREM AnalysisAbstract
The Head of School as head of the school is a contributing factor to success in efforts to strengthen governance, accountability, and public image. This success is not independent of competence and ability in tasks, roles, and functions. Providing primary service to all school citizens, optimizing the empowerment and development of the school citizen, focusing on performance and growth, and impacting school progress and society, this leadership is called serving leadership. Based on preliminary research, it is known that the head of a private SMK school in the Bogor district has not optimally demonstrated serving leadership. This research aims to produce ways and strategies for strengthening leadership serves by analyzing the influence of positive and dominant influence variables on serving leadership. The research uses the POP-HRM approach (Modeling and Management Resource Enhancement Optimization) with SITOREM analysis to produce optimal solutions from existing solutions. Implications of the research are, that if serving leadership wants to be empowered then it requires the development of adversity intelligence, proactive personality, teamwork, and increased commitment to the organization, as well as work motivation.
Downloads
References
Adam Focht and Micheal Ponton. (2015). “Identifying Primary Characteristics of Servant Leadership: Delphi Study, International Journal of Leadership Studies, Vo. 9, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 44-60
Covey, R. Steven, (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, 2004, New York: Free Press, A Division Simon & Schuster, Inc. pp. 70-75
Crant, J. Michael and Tomas S. Bateman. (2001). Charismatic Leadership View from Above: The Impact of Proactive Personality, Journal of Organizational Behavior 21 (1), 63 – 75
Dirk van Dierendonck. (2011). Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 4, July 2011, pp. 228-1261.
Don Hellriegel dan John W. Slochun Jr. (2011). Principles of Organizational Behavior. Thirteenth Edition. South-Western. Cengange Learning: (2011 : 328)
DuBrin, Andrew J., (2014). The Complete Ideal's Guides Leadership, try Tri Wibowo Budi Santoso. Jakarta: Grenada
Fred Luthans. (2006). Organizational Behavior. Seventh Edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill (2006: 249 – 250)
Hardhienata, S. The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Management, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 166 (2017) 012007 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012007
Ivancevich, John M. Robert Konopaske and Michael T. Matteson, (2008). Organizational Behavior and Management, New York: McGraw-Hill. (2008: 234).
J.L. Gibson, J.M. Ivancevich, J.H. Donnelly, Jr. and R. Konopaske. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012
Jennifer M. George dan R. Jones, (2012). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, 6th Ed. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2012, pp. 157-160
John R Schermerhorn, Jr., James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn, Mary Uhl-Bien, (2007). Organizational Behavior 11th Edition, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2007, pp. 34-35
Maria C.J. Santos (2012). “Assessing the Effectiveness of the Adapted Adversity Quotient Program in Special Education School”, International Referred Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 4(2), October 2012, pp. 13-23
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 06 tahun 2018 tentang Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 13 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah
R. Kreitner & A. Kinicki. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010, pp. 310-314
Rachapoom Pangma Sombat Tayraukham, and Prasar Nuangchalerm (2009). “Causal Factors Influencing Adversity Quotient of Twelfth Grade and Third-Year Vocational Students”, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2009, pp. 466-470
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J.C., & Santora, J.C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behavior in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402-424
Setyaningsih, S. Hardhienata, S (2019), Development of modeling and optimization method for strengthening management resources using a simple exploratory sequential analysis and sitorem analysis (POP-SDM). ISSN: 1315-5216 ISSN – electronic 2477-9555
Shivaranjani (2014), “Adversity Quotient: One Stop Solution to Combat Attrition Rate of Women in Indian It Sector”, International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, Vol.1, Issue.5, April June, 2014. Pp. 181- 189
Stephen P. Robbins and Timothy A. Judge. (2013). Organizational Behavior. London: Pearson Education Ltd., 2013, h. 343.
Stone, A.G., Russell, R.F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership. A difference in leader focus. The Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Tenner, A.R., & DeToro, I.J., (2002), Total Quality Management: Three Steps to Continuous Improvement. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Reading, M.A.p.183
Terence R. Mitchell dan James R. Larson, (2005) People in Organizations: An Introduction to Organizational Behavior, Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co. p.144
Tony Wijaya (2007). “Hubungan Adversity Intelligence dengan Intensi Berwirausaha”, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vo. 9, No.2, September 2007, pp.117-127.
Wexley, Kenneth N dan Gary A. Yukl, (2005). Perilaku Organisasi Dan Psikologi Perusahaan, Alih Bahasa: M. Shobarudin, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2005, pp 16 - 18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License